A spokesperson for IGT declined to comment. Zynga spokesperson Alan Lewis commented that Zynga is “pleased that the jury came to the right conclusion,” and that IGT’s accusations are “entirely without merit”. Not only did the jury find that Zynga was acting in good faith, but that IGT’s patent was invalid. The patent at the heart of the case is a piece of technology which allows mobile games to continue operating despite any interruptions in communication, such as network errors. The case, raised by gambling technology company IGT, concerned whether or not Zynga’s slot machine games infringed on its intellectual property rights. Zynga has emerged triumphant in a patent infringement case in Austin, Texas, reports Reuters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |